Thursday, May 10, 2012

Backup 14.2 The Development of Modern Banking

Section 2: The Development of Modern Banking

The United States experimented with many different kinds of money and faced many issues with it before it created the Federal Reserve System. Initially, each bank printed its own currency in different sizes, colors, and denominations. As a result, there were hundreds of different kinds of notes in circulation. Another issue was banks were tempted to print too much money because they could simply print more. Finally, counterfeiting became a concern. In 1861, the government printed greenbacks to finance the Civil War. In 1863, the National Banking System (NBS) was established which issued its own currency called National Bank notes. Other currencies of the period included gold certificates and silver certificates. The Federal Reserve System (Fed) was established in 1913 in order to assist with modern banking.

Content Vocabulary

state bank

A state bank is generally a financial institution that is chartered by a state. It differs from a reserve bank in that it does not necessarily control monetary policy (indeed, the state in question may have no legal capacity to create monetary policy), but instead usually offers only retail and commercial services.

A state bank that has been in operation for five years or less is called a de novo bank.[1]

In the United States the term "state bank" is used in contradistinction to "national bank." All national banks are chartered and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. State banks are chartered and regulated by a state agency (often called the Department of Financial Institutions) in the state in which its headquarters are located. In addition, state banks that are members of the Federal Reserve are regulated by the Federal Reserve; state banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Therefore, almost every state bank has both a state and federal regulator. There are a handful of state banks which do not have FDIC insurance.

An Introduction to State Banks (In Context), 7:43

How can state banks grow the economy?

What is the one state that has a state bank?

Is the unemployment rate high or low in this state?

Have they balanced their budget?

What early American founder encouraged these banks?

What could improve economic productivity?

What will they produce?

What is the relationship between commercial banks and state banks?

How does it actually work?

How does the state profit from this system, as opposed to how the Fed benefits?

How many states are proposing these banks?

Summarize the state bank system.

Is there accountability, as opposed to the Fed, in this banking system?

State public banks, an old American tradition, may provide an important tool to pull states out of the current economic slump. The concept is simple: The public bank uses state funds on deposit as bank reserves for making loans for infrastructure and other projects to Improve the state's economy and grow jobs.

Ben Franklin argued that colonial Pennsylvania's public bank was the key to the colony's 18th century prosperity. North Dakota, whose public bank has operated since 1919, boasts the lowest unemployment rate in the country and is the only state to have a balanced budget in each of the last three years.

In this video we highlight the research and efforts of Ellen Brown, the author of "Web of Debt" and others at the Public Banking Institute. Ellen was a guest on our radio show, In Context which is archived at our website, www.incontextreport.com. For more information on the public banking institute see their website at http://PublicBankingInstitute.org.

This program is an edition of the series In Context produced by MDR Productions, Inc. In Context is a live, call-in show that originates at Pacifica affiliate WPKN 89.5 FM, Bridgeport, CT whose signal reaches most of Connecticut and parts of New York.

It is broadcast on the first Sunday of the month at 10pm and first Wednesday of the month at 6:30pm and is streamed live at wpkn.org. For further information, please visit www.incontextreport.com.

legal tender

Legal tender is a medium of payment allowed by law or recognized by a legal system to be valid for meeting a financial obligation.[1] Paper currency is a common form of legal tender in many countries.

For instance, if an individual owes someone US$100 in the United States, he or she can try to pay the debt in Mexican Pesos or valuable jewelry or gold metal, or even a cheque or a charge card, but the creditor is not required to accept any of those as payment. The creditor must accept US $20 dollar bills, however, because that is legal tender in the United States. An individual can try to sell his or her pesos or gold to someone else in exchange for some US legal tender, and pay the debt with that money, but the creditor cannot force any specific person to satisfy a debt with pesos or gold. In Mexico, however, pesos are legal tender, and US dollars are not. So, by Mexican law, the creditor must accept pesos as payment, whereas the creditor can refuse US dollars or gold.

The origin of the term "legal tender" is from Middle English tendren, French tendre (verb form), meaning to offer. The Latin root is tendere (to stretch out), and the sense of tender as an offer is related to the etymology of the English word extend (to hold outward).[2] The noun form of a tender as an offering is a back-formation of the noun from the verb.[citation needed]

Legal tender is variously defined in different jurisdictions. Formally, it is anything which when offered in payment extinguishes the debt. Thus, personal cheques, credit cards, debit cards, and similar non-cash methods of payment are not usually legal tender. The law does not relieve the obligation until payment is accepted. Coins and notes are usually defined as legal tender. Some jurisdictions may forbid or restrict payment made other than by legal tender. For example, such a law might outlaw the use of foreign coins and bank notes, or require a license to perform financial transactions in a foreign currency.

In some jurisdictions legal tender can be refused as payment if no debt exists prior to the time of payment (where the obligation to pay may arise at the same time as the offer of payment). For example vending machines and transport staff do not have to accept the largest denomination of banknote. Shopkeepers can reject large banknotes — this is covered by the legal concept known as invitation to treat. However, restaurants that do not collect payment until after a meal is served would have to accept that legal tender for the debt incurred in purchasing the meal.

The right, in many jurisdictions, of a trader to refuse to do business with any person means a purchaser cannot demand to make a purchase, and so declaring a legal tender in law, as anything other than an offered payment for debts already incurred, would not be effective.

Constitution Lecture Extra: Coining Money and Legal Tender, 4:37

Where is the legal tender power not given in the Constitution?

What is the best argument in granting the power to coin money?

Section 8 gives Congress what power?

The Federal government has no power to do what according to the Constitution?

The power to coin money and the power to establish legal tender are two different things.

Not a part of the normal lecture series, but an applied exercise. This deals with Congress's power to coin money, and whether or not it includes the power to establish a legal tender.

This is made in response to a video by Dr. Tom Woods, who in turn was responding to people criticizing Ron Paul for saying that the Federal government has no power to establish a fiat money as legal tender. You can see his video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40MBdt1BQgE

national bank

In banking, the term national bank carries several meanings:

  • especially in developing countries, a bank owned by the state
  • an ordinary private bank which operates nationally (as opposed to regionally or locally or even internationally)
  • in the United States, an ordinary private bank operating within a specific regulatory structure, which may or may not operate nationally, under the supervision of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

In the past, the term "national bank" has been used synonymously with "central bank", but it is no longer used in this sense today. Some central banks may have the words "National Bank" in their name; conversely if a bank is named in this way, it is not automatically considered a central bank. For example, National-Bank AG in Essen, Germany is a privately owned commercial bank, just like National Bank of Canada of Montreal, Canada. On the other side, National Bank of Ethiopia is the central bank of Ethiopia and National Bank of Cambodia is the central bank of Cambodia.

Alexander Hamilton on a National Bank, 4:34

Why did Alexander Hamilton argue in favor of a national bank?

What had the individual states incurred?

How is the power of the central government increased?

How does this result in a Revolution fought in vain?

Why did the Founders limit the power of the central government?

How did the first President limit himself?

The First Bank of the United States was needed because the government had a debt from the Revolutionary War, and each state had a different form of currency. It was built while Philadelphia was still the nation's capital. Alexander Hamilton conceived of the bank to handle the colossal war debt — and to create a standard form of currency.

Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and John Adams are also in this video.

national currency

Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law. The term derives from the Latin fiat, meaning "let it be done" or "it shall be," as such money is established by government decree. Where fiat money is used as currency, the term fiat currency is used.

Fiat money originated in 11th century China,[1] and its use became widespread during the Yuan and Ming dynasties.[2] The Nixon Shock of 1971 ended the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. Since then all reserve currencies have been fiat currencies, including the US dollar and the euro.[3]

gold certificate

A gold certificate in general is a certificate of ownership that gold owners hold instead of storing the actual gold. It has both a historic meaning as a US paper currency (1882–1933) and a current meaning as a way to invest in gold.

Banks may issue gold certificates for gold which is allocated (non-fungible) or unallocated (fungible or pooled). Unallocated gold certificates are a form of fractional reserve banking and do not guarantee an equal exchange for metal in the event of a run on the issuing bank's gold on deposit.[1] Allocated gold certificates should be correlated with specific numbered bars, although it is difficult to determine whether a bank is improperly allocating a single bar to more than one party.[2]

silver certificate

Silver Certificates are a type of representative money printed from 1878 to 1964 in the United States as part of its circulation of paper currency.[1] They were produced in response to silver agitation by citizens who were angered by the Fourth Coinage Act, which had effectively placed the United States on a gold standard. The certificates were initially redeemable in the same face value of silver dollar coins, and later in raw silver bullion. Since 1968 they have been redeemable only in Federal Reserve Notes and are thus obsolete, but are still valid legal tender.

central bank

A central bank, reserve bank, or monetary authority is an institution that manages a nation's currency, money supply, and interest rates. Central banks also usually oversee the commercial banking system of their respective countries. In contrast to a commercial bank, a central bank possesses a monopoly on increasing the nation's monetary base, and usually also prints the national currency, which usually serves as the nation's legal tender.[1][2] Examples include the European Central Bank (ECB), the Federal Reserve of the United States, and the People's Bank of China.[3]

The primary function of a central bank is to manage the nation's money supply (monetary policy), through active duties such as managing interest rates, setting the reserve requirement, and acting as alender of last resort to the banking sector during times of bank insolvency or financial crisis. Central banks usually also have supervisory powers, intended to prevent commercial banks and other financial institutions from reckless or fraudulent behavior. Central banks in most developed nations are institutionally designed to be independent from political interference.

What is a Central Bank? 3:38

What is a central bank?

What two powers do they have?

How is money regulated?

What does it produce in the long run?

Where does the money come from?

Were the Founders aware of the problem?

When was the Founder's system changed?

What is important to understand about the Fed?

Does it operate transparently?

Description of a Central Bank and the Federal Reserve Act. Where most of our income tax dollars go.

bank run

A bank run (also known as a run on the bank) occurs when a large number of customers withdraw their deposits because they believe the bank is, or might become, insolvent. As a bank run progresses, it generates its own momentum, in a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy (or positive feedback): as more people withdraw their deposits, the likelihood of default increases, and this encourages further withdrawals. This can destabilize the bank to the point where it faces bankruptcy.[1]

A banking panic or bank panic is a financial crisis that occurs when many banks suffer runs at the same time. A systemic banking crisis is one where all or almost all of the banking capital in a country is wiped out.[2] The resulting chain of bankruptcies can cause a long economic recession.[3] Much of the Great Depression's economic damage was caused directly by bank runs.[4] The cost of cleaning up a systemic banking crisis can be huge, with fiscal costs averaging 13% of GDP and economic output losses averaging 20% of GDP for important crises from 1970 to 2007.[2]

Several techniques can help to prevent bank runs. They include temporary suspension of withdrawals, the organization of central banks that act as a lender of last resort, the protection of deposit insurance systems such as the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,[1] and governmental bank regulation.[5] These techniques do not always work: for example, even with deposit insurance, depositors may still be motivated by beliefs they may lack immediate access to deposits during a bank reorganization.[6]

Bonus video: The Bank run, 7:00

A clip from the 1946 film It's A Wonderful Life.

13 July 1931, Run on bank, Berlin

13July1931BerlineRunOnBank

EXCLUSIVE: Bank Run, Food Shortage, Riots, and Worldwide Collapse, 2:48

With a bank run, what results?

On a global basis, what might happen?

he Money GPS by David Quintieri prepares the reader to avoid certain collapse that is spreading worldwide. It features Bob Chapman, James Turk, and David Morgan.

This is the trailer to the newly released book by David Quintieri in which several predictions within have already come true.

The free 40-page version of the book is available athttp://TheMoneyGPS.com/free

The full version is available on the Createspace eSpace store at:
https://www.createspace.com/3793027

And also on Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/Money-GPS-Guiding-Through-Uncertain/dp/0987924109

bank holiday

A bank holiday is a public holiday in the United Kingdom or a colloquialism for public holiday in Ireland. There is no automatic right to time off on these days, although the majority of the population is granted time off work or extra pay for working on these days, depending on their contract.[1] The first official bank holidays were the four days named in the Bank Holidays Act 1871, but today the term is colloquially (albeit incorrectly) used for public holidays which are not officially bank holidays, for example Good Friday and Christmas Day.

fractional reserve system

Fractional-reserve banking is a form of banking where banks maintain reserves (of cash and coin or deposits at the central bank) that are only a fraction of the customer's deposits. Funds deposited into a bank are mostly lent out, and a bank keeps only a fraction (called the reserve ratio) of the quantity of deposits as reserves. Some of the funds lent out are subsequently deposited with another bank, increasing deposits at that second bank and allowing further lending. As most bank deposits are treated as money in their own right, fractional reserve banking increases the money supply, and banks are said to create money. Due to the prevalence of fractional reserve banking, the broad money supply of most countries is a multiple larger than the amount of base money created by the country's central bank. That multiple (called the money multiplier) is determined by the reserve requirement or other financial ratio requirements imposed by financial regulators, and by the excess reserves kept by commercial banks.[1][2]

Central banks generally mandate reserve requirements that require banks to keep a minimum fraction of their demand deposits as cash reserves. This both limits the amount of money creation that occurs in the commercial banking system,[2] and ensures that banks have enough ready cash to meet normal demand for withdrawals. Problems can arise, however, when depositors seek withdrawal of a large proportion of deposits at the same time; this can cause a bank run or, when problems are extreme and widespread, a systemic crisis. To mitigate this risk, the governments of most countries (usually acting through the central bank) regulate and oversee commercial banks, provide deposit insurance and act as lender of last resort to commercial banks.

Fractional-reserve banking is the most common form of banking and is practiced in almost all countries. Although Islamic banking prohibits the making of profit from interest on debt, a form of fractional-reserve banking is still evident in most Islamic countries.

Rothbard on Fractional Reserve Banking, Bank Runs, and the FDIC, 2:35

Bank runs have occurred before such as during the Great Depression.

Do people have to believe the fractional reserve banking system protects their money?

Is your money really held in a bank for you?

Murray N. Rothbard presented this speech at the Michigan Libertarian Party Convention, held in Southfield, Michigan, in May 1989. This is an excerpt where he discusses Banking, FDIC, Fractional-Reserve Banking, Bank Runs, The FDIC and deposit insurance.

legal reserves

The reserve requirement (or cash reserve ratio) is a central bank regulation that sets the minimum reserves each commercial bank must hold (rather than lend out) of customer deposits and notes. It is normally in the form of cash stored physically in a bank vault (vault cash) or deposits made with a central bank.

The required reserve ratio is sometimes used as a tool in monetary policy, influencing the country's borrowing and interest rates by changing the amount of funds available for banks to make loans with[1]. Western central banks rarely alter the reserve requirements because it would cause immediate liquidity problems for banks with low excess reserves; they generally prefer to use open market operations (buying and selling government-issued bonds) to implement their monetary policy. ThePeople's Bank of China uses changes in reserve requirements as an inflation-fighting tool,[2] and raised the reserve requirement ten times in 2007 and eleven times since the beginning of 2010. As of 2006 the required reserve ratio in the United States was 10% on transaction deposits and zero on time deposits and all other deposits.

An institution that holds reserves in excess of the required amount is said to hold excess reserves.

reserve requirement

Word of the Day: Reserve Requirements, 2:33

In your own words, what is the reserve requirement?

In plain English, this means what?

When the reserve requirement is increased what results?

If China does this what happens?

The reserve requirements set the amount of funds that a depository institution must hold in reserve against specified deposit liabilities. Depository institutions must hold reserves in the form of vault cash or deposits with Federal Reserve Banks. The reserve requirement can affect monetary policy, because the higher the reserve requirement is set, the less money banks will have to loan out, leading to lower money creation, and maintaining the purchasing power of the currency previously in use. The effect is exponential, because money that is loaned out can be re-deposited; a portion of that money may again be re-loaned, and so on.
To watch the full episode of Capital Account with Lauren Lyster check out
http://youtube.com/capitalaccount
Follow Lauren on Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenlyster

member bank reserve (MBR)

excess reserves

In banking, excess reserves are bank reserves in excess of the reserve requirement set by a central bank. They are reserves of cash more than the required amounts.[1] Holding excess reserves has an opportunity cost if higher risk-adjusted interest can be earned by putting the funds elsewhere; the advantage of holding some funds in excess reserves is that doing so may provide enhanced liquidity and therefore flexibility in bank operations.

For banks in the U.S. Federal Reserve System, this is accomplished by making short-term (usually overnight) loans on the federal funds market to banks who may be short of their reserve requirements. However, some banks may choose to hold their excess reserves in order to facilitate upcoming transactions or meet contractual clearing balance requirements.

The minimum reserves and the excess reserves of private (commercial) banks are held as FRB (Federal Reserve Bank) credit in FRB accounts. The total amount of FRB credit held by private banks and the amount of FRB credit that the US government holds in its FRB account, together with all currency and vault cash form the monetary base.

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

On October 3, 2008, Section 128 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allowed the Fed to begin paying interest on excess reserve balances as well as required reserves. They began doing so three days later.[2] Banks had already begun increasing the amount of their money on deposit with the Fed at the beginning of September, up from about $10 billion total at the end of August, 2008, to $880 billion by the end of the second week of January, 2009.[3][4] In comparison, the increase in reserve balances reached only $65 billion after September 11, 2001 before falling back to normal levels within a month. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's original bailout proposal under which the government would acquire up to $700 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities contained no provision to begin paying interest on reserve balances.[5]

The day before the change was announced, on October 7, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke expressed some confusion about it, saying, "We're not quite sure what we have to pay in order to get the market rate, which includes some credit risk, up to the target. We're going to experiment with this and try to find what the right spread is."[6] The Fed adjusted the rate on October 22, after the initial rate they set October 6 failed to keep the benchmark U.S. overnight interest rate close to their policy target,[6][7] and again on November 5 for the same reason.[8]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that payment of interest on reserve balances would cost the American taxpayers about one tenth of the present 0.25% interest rate on $800 billion in deposits:

14.2 Reading Strategy

Chapter14Section2ReadingStrategy

Products in the News

New $10 Bills

The Development of Banking in America

Privately Issued Bank Notes

Growth of State Banking

Problems With Currency

p. 391

Money

Why did the federal government stop printing paper currency?

p. 392

Private Bank Notes

What were the major problems with such currencies?

Greenbacks

The National Banking System

Other Federal Currencies

Reading Check

Explaining

Why did the government issue greenbacks in 1861?

The Creation of the Fed

The Federal Reserve System

Banking in the Great Depression

p. 394

The Great Depression

Why did bank runs occur?

Figure 14.1 State and National Banks

Economic Analysis

What can you infer about the ratio of state banks to national banks?

http://glencoe.com/sites/common_assets/socialstudies/in_motion_08/epp/EPP_p395.swf

Federal Deposit Insurance

Figure 14.2 Fractional Reserves and the Money Supply

Economic Analysis

If the initial reserves were $2,000, how large could the money supply get?

Fractional Reserves and Deposit Expansion

Reading Check

Describing

What is the purpose of the FDIC?

14.2 Review

Chapter14Section2Review

Ben Bernanke Introduced to Andrew Jackson: Hilarious!, 5:46

March 2, 2011

"You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." --Andrew Jackson, 1828 (to a group of investment bankers trying to persuade him to renew their central bank charter)

 

Saturday, December 17, 2011

FDR Saudi Arabia Petroleum

FDR's meeting with King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia "produced the unprecedented oil-for-protection arrangement that has governed American ties with Saudi Arabia ever since" (xiii). During World War II it became clear that reserves of American oil were inadequate for wartime and the post-war peace. American policy makers were determined to ensure an assured pipeline (p. 29). As "codified in the Foreign Petroleum Policy of the United States, a policy statement released by the State Department in 1944" (p. 30).

Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America's Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum by Michael T. Klare

Monday, November 28, 2011

HW Econ and WH HW Week of 28 November

Econ

Monday HW

1. p. 113, #29.

Tuesday HW

1. p. 113, #30.

Wednesday HW

1. p. 113, #31-32.

Thursday HW

1. p. 115, #1-3.

Friday HW

1. p. 116, #1-2.

WH

Monday

1. p. 388, History Through Architecture

Tuesday

1. Reading Check, Examining, p. 389.

Wednesday

1. Reading Check, Describing, p. 390.

Thursday

1. Picturing History, p. 390.

Friday HW

p. 391, History Through Art.

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Chapter 12 Section 3 National Unification and the National State

Prayer (alphabetical):

And, to anticipate further revolutionary developments, as a critique of capitalism, we will consider Karl Marx.

In fact, a major new series has been announced where American school children will learn about Marx in school.

Kids to Meet Marx in American Schools: A Tale of the History Channel and Hollywood.

Brian Jones, a New York teacher and actor, is a board member of VOICES and has also played the lead in Zinn’s play Marx in SoHo. Jones extols the benefits of this one man play as a tool to introduce people to Marx’s ideas.



Jones is also a regular contributor to Socialist Worker, International Socialist Review, and speaks regularly on the beneficial principles of Marxism, including this year at the 2009 Socialism Conference. He recently gave a speech on the failure of capitalism, proclaiming that “Marx is back.”


According to a Zinn Educational Project report, in April 2008, with support from an anonymous donor, ZEP partnered with 32 organizations to offer 31,000 teachers and teacher educators free packets for instilling the "people's history" in schools across the country. The ZEP reports it quickly received requests for its available 4,000 free packets, nearly half of which were sent to schools in California, New York and Illinois.

A graphic illustrating where ZEP sent the packets is below:




Wiki new policy/Twitter

Due to the misleading information posted on the wiki after the Test was made (48 hours before the Test so it could be copied in time) please note that the wiki is now a protected site.

Test/Quiz pages will have a permission policy that differ from the overall wiki permissions. Please note that they will now be locked 48 hours before a Test/Quiz; thereafter, the pages can only be edited by the organizer. In this way, everyone will have the same study page, including those who "cram" in the last 48 hours.
You can be informed of the 48 hour locked Test/Quiz page by following me as gmicksmith on Twitter. Sign up today.

Twitter in Plain English


Twitter in the Classroom




Chapter 12 Section 3 National Unification and the National State
Unification occurred at different times and in different forms throughout Europe and in North America. The Crimean War destroyed the Concert of Europe. A defeated Russia retreated from European affairs, and Austria was isolated. Italian and German nationalists exploited Austria's isolation. Both gained important territory in the Austro-Prussian War and the Franco-Prussian War, and a unified Germany and Italy emerged. Growing prosperity and expanded voting rights helped Great Britain avoid revolution in 1848. In 1852, the French voted to restore their empire. Louis-Napoleon became the authoritarian Napoleon III and ruled until France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War. Austria granted Hungarians the right to govern their own domestic affairs. In Russia, Czar Alexander II freed the serfs and instituted other reforms. When a radical assassinated him, his son, Alexander III, reverted to repressive rule. The United States endured a costly civil war to settle the conflict over slavery between the Northern and Southern states. After two short rebellions, Canada won its independence from Great Britain.

Main Ideas

The rise of nationalism contributed to the unification of Italy and Germany.

While nationalism had great appeal, not all people achieved the goal of establishing their own national states.

Key Terms

militarism

kaiser

plebiscite

emancipation

abolitionism

secede

Otto von Bismarck
Quotes from Bismarck



chancellor

Realpolitik

annex

Reich

Industrial Europe ca. 1850

Breakdown of the Concert of Europe
War and Civilization, Crimea, War, technology, and Industry, Blood & Iron



Reading Check

Explaining

How did the Crimean War destroy the Concert of Europe?

Italian Unification
Interactive Map Unifying Italy

For: Interactive timeline
Visit: PHSchool.com
Web Code: nap-2232

Reading Check

Explaining

How did Giuseppe Garibaldi contribute to Italian unification?

German Unification

Bismarck pictured greeting representatives at the Congress of Berlin.



Note Taking

Reading Skill: Recognize Sequence

Keep track of the sequence of events described in this section by completing a chart like the one below. List the causes that led to a strong German nation.






The Price of Nationalism Audio: Germany

The last half of the 1800s can be called the Age of Nationalism. By harnessing national feeling, European leaders fought ruthlessly to create strong, unified nations. Under Otto von Bismarck, Germany emerged as Europe’s most powerful empire—but at a considerable cost. In his 1870 diary, Crown Prince Friedrich wrote:

“[Germany had once been admired as a] nation of thinkers and philosophers, poets and artists, idealists and enthusiasts . . . [but now the world saw Germany as] a nation of conquerors and destroyers, to which no pledged word, no treaty, is sacred. . . . We are neither loved nor respected, but only feared.”
Bismarck: Germany From Blood and Iron (clip)


Blood and Iron: Audio

Otto von Bismarck succeeded where others had failed. Bismarck came from Prussia’s Junker (yoong kur) class, made up of conservative landowning nobles. Bismarck first served Prussia as a diplomat in Russia and France. In 1862, King William I made him prime minister. Within a decade, the new prime minister had become chancellor, or the highest official of a monarch, and had used his policy of “blood and iron” to unite the German states under Prussian rule.

Bismarck Unites Germany: Audio
Prussian legislators waited restlessly for Otto von Bismarck to speak. He wanted them to vote for more money to build up the army. Liberal members opposed the move. Bismarck rose and dismissed their concerns:

“Germany does not look to Prussia’s liberalism, but to her power. . . . The great questions of the day are not to be decided by speeches and majority resolutions—that was the mistake of 1848 and 1849—but by blood and iron!”

—Otto von Bismarck, 1862

Map

Unification of Germany, 1865–1871

Go Online
For: Audio guided tour
Visit: PHSchool.com
Web Code: nap-2211

1. Locate

To the East? West? Near what countries? Bodies of water, etc.

a) Prussia; b) Silesia; c) Bavaria; d) Schleswig

2. Region

What are did Prussia add to its territory in 1866?

3. Analyzing Information

Why do you think Austrian influence was greater among the southern German states than among the northern ones?

This map is titled “Unification of Germany, 1865 to 1871.” A circular image below the title to the right gives a global view of the map area.

The map extends north-south from Denmark and Sweden to the Mediterranean Sea. The map extends east-west from Russia to central France. A Key at the right shows the following shading and symbols: yellow shading; Prussia, 1865; light green shading, Added to Prussia, 1866; dark green shading, Added to form North German Confederation, 1867; orange shading, Added to form German empire, 1871; red line, Boundary of German empire, 1871;

red explosion symbol, Battle sites; orange arrow, Route of Prussian armies in Austro-Prussian War; and green arrow, Route of German armies in Franco-Prussian War.

The boundary of the German empire in 1871, indicated by a red line, borders the North Sea, Denmark, and the Baltic Sea in the north, Russia and Austria-Hungary in the east, Switzerland in the south, and France, Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Netherlands in the west. Prussia in 1865, shaded in yellow, includes the western province of Westphalia. Another large yellow-shaded area appears in the north and east. Brandenburg, including the city of Berlin, is in the center. The provinces of Pomerania, West Prussia, and East Prussia are in the northeast. Posen is in the East, and Silesia is in the southeast. Two other small yellow areas appear in the center. Another small yellow area, labeled Hohenzollern, appears in the south. The area added to Prussia in 1866, shaded in light green, includes the northwest area bordering the Netherlands and Denmark.

The province of Schleswig is in today’s southern Denmark. Holstein is south of Schleswig. The city of Hamburg and the province of Hanover are south of Holstein. Another light green area appears in the center. The cities of Ems, east of the Rhine River, and Frankfurt to the southeast are in this area. The area added to form the North German Confederation in 1867, shaded in dark green, appears in the north between the light green and yellow areas. It is labeled Mecklenburg. Another dark green area appears in the center on the Austria-Hungary border. The provinces of Thuringia and Saxony are in this area. Other green areas are scattered throughout the center. The area added to form the German empire in 1871, shaded in orange, includes southern Germany. Lorraine, including the city of Metz, and Alsace are in the west, bordering France. Württemberg is in the center, Baden is in the south, and Bavaria, including the city of Munich, is in the east. Orange arrows extend from the Saxony and Silesia regions across the Austria-Hungary border to Sadowa. A red battle symbol appears here. Green arrows extend from Lorraine, through Metz, across the French border to Sedan. A battle symbol appears here. The arrows extend westward toward Paris.

Learn

Focus Question

How did Otto von Bismarck, the Chancellor of Prussia, lead the drive for German unity?

Master of Realpolitik

Bismarck’s success was due in part to his strong will. He was a master of Realpolitik (ray ahl poh lee teek), or realistic politics based on the needs of the state. In the case of Realpolitik, power was more important than principles.

Although Bismarck was the architect of German unity, he was not really a German nationalist. His primary loyalty was to the Hohenzollerns (hoh un tsawl urnz), the ruling dynasty of Prussia, who represented a powerful, traditional monarchy. Through unification, he hoped to bring more power to the Hohenzollerns.

Royal house medal of the Hohenzollerns




Strengthening the Army

As Prussia’s prime minister, Bismarck first moved to build up the Prussian army. Despite his “blood and iron” speech, the liberal legislature refused to vote for funds for the military. In response, Bismarck strengthened the army with money that had been collected for other purposes. With a powerful, well-equipped military, he was then ready to pursue an aggressive foreign policy. Over the next decade, Bismarck led Prussia into three wars. Each war increased Prussian prestige and power and paved the way for German unity.

Prussia Declares War With Denmark and Austria

Bismarck’s first maneuver was to form an alliance in 1864 with Austria. Prussia and Austria then seized the provinces of Schleswig and Holstein from Denmark. After a brief war, Prussia and Austria “liberated” the two provinces and divided up the spoils. Austria was to administer Holstein and Prussia was to administer Schleswig.

In 1866, Bismarck invented an excuse to attack Austria. The Austro-Prussian War lasted just seven weeks and ended in a decisive Prussian victory. Prussia then annexed, or took control of, several other north German states.

Bismarck dissolved the Austrian-led German Confederation and created a new confederation dominated by Prussia. He allowed Austria and four other southern German states to remain independent. Bismarck’s motives, as always, were strictly practical. “We had to avoid leaving behind any desire for revenge,” he later wrote.

Primary Source

War and Power

In 1866, Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke analyzed the importance of Prussia’s war against Austria. Why, according to von Moltke, did Prussia go to war against Austria?

Primary Source

“The war of 1866 was entered on not because the existence of Prussia was threatened, nor was it caused by public opinion and the voice of the people; it was a struggle, long foreseen and calmly prepared for, recognized as a necessity by the Cabinet, not for territorial expansion, for an extension of our domain, or for material advantage, but for an ideal end—the establishment of power. Not a foot of land was exacted from Austria. . . . Its center of gravity lay out of Germany; Prussia’s lay within it. Prussia felt itself called upon and strong enough to assume the leadership of the German races.”

France Declares War on Prussia

In France, the Prussian victory over Austria angered Napoleon III. A growing rivalry between the two nations led to the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.
Franco-Prussian War (1870)



The causes of the Franco-Prussian War are rooted in the shifting balance of power in Europe after the Napoleonic wars. France and Prussia had fought against each other, with France beating Prussia in 1806, then losing in 1813-1815. In the following decades, Prussia was generally considered by the French as a modern, enlightened country. Republicans particularly favoured the prospect of seeing the German nation unite under Prussian leadership, displacing the old, catholic Austrian empire. Prussia hold similar views, but cultivated an image of France as the hereditary enemy: Prussia was to replace Austria as the head of Germany, and to replace France as the leader in continental Europe.

Napoleon III became emperor in France thanks to a coup in 1851. He initially supported the German unification policy of Otto von Bismarck, chancellor of Prussia under king Wilhelm I. It was only after the Austro-Prussian war of 1866 that France began to worry about the fast-rising Prussian power. To be able to face the Prussian conscription-based army, military reform was debated in the French parliament, but refused by the Left which considered there was no danger of war.

In July 1870, a diplomatic crisis broke, Bismarck managed to provoke the French into declaring war to Prussia — and French diplomacy fell in the trap.

Germans recalled only too well the invasions of Napoleon I some 60 years earlier. Bismarck played up the image of the French menace to spur German nationalism. For his part, Napoleon III did little to avoid war, hoping to mask problems at home with military glory.

Bismarck furthered the crisis by rewriting and then releasing to the press a telegram that reported on a meeting between King William I and the French ambassador. Bismarck’s editing of the “Ems dispatch” made it seem that William I had insulted the Frenchman. Furious, Napoleon III declared war on Prussia, as Bismarck had hoped.

Vocabulary Builder

edit—(ed it) v. to make additions, deletions, or other changes to a piece of writing

A superior Prussian force, supported by troops from other German states, smashed the badly organized and poorly supplied French soldiers. Napoleon III, old and ill, surrendered within a few weeks. France had to accept a humiliating peace.

France had a good professional army, which was indeed able to face the Prussians. But a decisive strategic surprise came when all German states took side with Prussia: The French were overwhelmed, outmaneuvered and, in spite of ferocious combats, finally beaten. After Sept. 4th, the new Republic refused to sign an armistice, managed to hastily improvise "armies" out of civilian volunteers, but these were no match for the well-trained Prussians. The war ended when Parisians, besieged, bombarded and starved, surrendered.

The Prussian Army held a brief victory parade in Paris on 17 February, 1871, and Bismarck honoured the armistice by sending trainloads of food into Paris and moving Prussian forces to the east of the city. Prussian armies would occupy parts of France until the French completed the payment of a five-billion francs war indemnity. Then, they would withdraw to Alsace and Lorraine. An exodus occurred from Paris as some 200,000 people, predominantly middle-class, left the city for the countryside. Paris was quickly re-supplied with free food and fuel by the United Kingdom and several accounts recall life in the city settling back to normal.

The war ended up with a complete triumph for Prussia, whose king was proclaimed emperor of Germany in the palace of Versailles — a supreme humiliation of the French and a Prussian revenge on Napoleon's victorious march in Berlin.
The Treaty of Frankfurt gave Germany Alsace and the northern portion of Lorraine (Moselle), where Germanic dialects were spoken by parts of the population. Most importantly, Germany now possessed Metz, a key fortified stronghold between the two countries. Part of the Alsacians refused to live under German rule and emigrated to "inner France".

The loss of this territory was a source of resentment in France for years to come, and revanchism even inspired an attempted coup in Paris in the 1880s. Yet, by 1900, new generations tended to consider it old history, while Alsacians adapted more or less reluctantly to German rule [see Barrès "Au service de l'Allemagne"]. No French political party put forward a reconquest of Alsace-Lorraine in its program. Compensations were found in colonization abroad. When World War I broke out, the French mobilized with the idea to defend their territory as it was, not to take back Alsace-Lorraine, as soldiers' diaries and letters indicate.

Had Germany not taken the option of war in 1914, its successful path paved by the 1870 triumph would have led it to become peacefully the uncontested leader in Europe.



Checkpoint

What techniques did Bismarck use to unify the German states?

Birth of the German Empire: Audio

Delighted by the victory over France, princes from the southern German states and the North German Confederation persuaded William I of Prussia to take the title kaiser (ky zur), or emperor. In January 1871, German nationalists celebrated the birth of the Second Reich, or empire. They called it that because they considered it heir to the Holy Roman Empire.

A constitution drafted by Bismarck set up a two-house legislature. The Bundesrat (boon dus raht), or upper house, was appointed by the rulers of the German states. The Reichstag (ryks tahg), or lower house, was elected by universal male suffrage. Because the Bundesrat could veto any decisions of the Reichstag, real power remained in the hands of the emperor and his chancellor.

Checkpoint

How was the new German government, drafted by Bismarck, structured?

The New German Empire

Audio

In 1870, German historian Heinrich von Treitschke (vawn trych kuh) wrote a newspaper article demanding the annexation of Alsace and Lorraine from France. A year later, annexation became a condition of the peace settlement in the Franco-­Prussian War:

“The sense of justice to Germany demands the lessening of France. . . . These territories are ours by the right of the sword, and . . . [by] virtue of a higher right—the right of the German nation, which will not permit its lost children to remain strangers to the German Empire.”

Learn

Focus Question

How did Germany increase its power after unifying in 1871?

In January 1871, German princes gathered in the glittering Hall of Mirrors at the French palace of Versailles. They had just defeated Napoleon III in the Franco-Prussian War. Once home to French kings, the palace seemed the perfect place to proclaim the new German empire. To the winners as well as to the losers, the symbolism was clear: French domination of Europe had ended. Germany was now the dominant power in Europe.

Reading Check

Summarizing

What events led to German unification?

A Political Game of Chess

This political cartoon shows Otto von Bismarck and Pope Pius IX trying to checkmate each other in a game of chess.

1. How does this cartoon reflect the relationship between Bismarck and the Catholic Church?

2. How did the conflict between church and state affect German politics in the 1870s?

On the domestic front, Bismarck applied the same ruthless methods he had used to achieve unification. The Iron Chancellor, as he was called, sought to erase local loyalties and crush all opposition to the imperial state. He targeted two groups—the Catholic Church and the Socialists. In his view, both posed a threat to the new German state.

Crankshaw, one of Bismarck's biographers, describes the tragedy of Bismarck. It is not that he "subordinated morality to the supposed needs of the state," many politicians do that; it is that "his countrymen surrendered to the principle (pp. 413-414)."

The German people saw it happening and lacked the will to stop it. Bismarck and the people each corrupted the other. To say that Bismarck was a direct precursor of Hitler is evidently untrue; but it is not untrue, I think, to say that those aspects of the German character which made it possible for Bismarck to rule for just on thirty years were those same aspects which made it too easy for a Hitler to take power and keep it (p. 414).



Nationalism and Reform in Europe

Great Britain

France

The Austrian Empire

Russia
Although serfdom had almost disappeared in Western Europe by the 1700s, it survived in Russia. Masters exercised almost total power over their serfs. A noble turned revolutionary described the treatment of the serfs:

“I heard . . . stories of men and women torn from their families and their villages, and sold, or lost in gambling, or exchanged for a couple of hunting dogs, and then transported to some remote part of Russia to create a [master’s] new estate; of children taken from their parents and sold to cruel . . . masters.”

—Peter Kropotkin, Memoirs of a Revolutionist


Learn

Focus Question

Why did industrialization and reform come more slowly to Russia than to Western Europe?
Reading Check

Examining

How was Great Britain able to avoid a revolution in 1848?

Nationalism in the United States



Graphic Notes: "Downfall of Mother Bank," depicting President Andrew Jackson holding up an "Order of the Removal of the Public Money" during the fight over the Bank of the United States, 1833. E.W. Clay lithograph.

Citation: American Antiquarian Society, 185 Salisbury St, Worcester, MA 01609-1634 and the Library of Congress.

Nicholas Biddle was the president of the Bank of the United States during the Bank War of 1832. Biddle held a great deal of unwarranted power over the nation’s finances, which President Jackson resented. When Jackson vetoed a bill to renew the Bank’s charter, Biddle agreed with Senator Henry Clay that this would hurt him in the upcoming presidential election of 1832, but both of them were proven wrong. When Jackson tried to end the bank by withdrawing deposits, Biddle caused a financial panic to try and prevent Jackson from attaining the presidency which failed when Jackson was re-elected.
The Bank War began with Senators Noah Webster and Clay with their Recharter Bill: Clay and Webster presented Congress with a Recharter Bill for the Bank of the United States in 1832. Although four years before the charter would expire, Clay hoped to make the Bank an issue in the upcoming presidential election, which he hoped to win. Clay hoped to quickly pass the Bill in Congress, then send it to the White House to be signed by Jackson. Clay knew Jackson would most likely veto the bill, alienating the elite in the upcoming election, therefore favoring Clay. Jackson did veto the bill, but contrary to Clay’s expectation, gained popular public support for his statement.

The “Pet” banks where surplus federal funds were placed after the closing of the Bank of the United States. The banks were chosen for their support of president Jackson and soon flooded the country with paper money as there was no longer a central, federal finance institution. As a result of the massive amounts of paper money, inflation skyrocketed, and Jackson was forced to try to slow inflation with his Specie Circular.

The Specie Circular (1836) was decreed by Jackson which stated that all public lands had to be purchased with “hard” money, gold or silver. Jackson took this measure to slow the runaway inflation caused by his closure of the Bank of the United States.

Reading Check

Explaining

How did the election of Andrew Jackson influence American politics?
The divisions between Americans eventually led to fighting in the Civil War.

You can learn more about music from the period by listening to:
"When Johnny Comes Marching Home." In this exercise you can 1) view the exhibit; 2) read the lyrics; 3) learn more; and, 4) rewrite the song.

The Emergence of a Canadian Nation

Reading Check

Describing

How did the British North American Act change the government of Canada?

Map: The Dominion of Canada in the Nineteenth Century

A novel about the Crimean War:

Master George by Beryl Bainbridge

Visit an interactive exhibit about the gold rush.

The American Civil War.

Everyday life of a Civil War soldier

Civil War diary accounts

The Civil War: A Film by Ken Burns

Short animated movie about the American Civil War


New holiday feature: keep Christ in Christmas

Brother Ray performing at the Monastery Of Ettal in Germany 1979


I´ll be home for Christmas-Fats Domino



HW email to gmsmith@shanahan.org
Tuesday HW

You can be informed of the 48 hour locked Test/Quiz page by following me as gmicksmith on Twitter. Sign up today.

1. How did the Crimean War destroy the Concert of Europe?

2. How did Giuseppe Garibaldi contribute to Italian unification?

Wednesday HW

Unification of Germany, 1865–1871

Go Online
For: Audio guided tour
Visit: PHSchool.com
Web Code: nap-2211

1. Locate

To the East? West? Near what countries? Bodies of water, etc.

a) Prussia; b) Silesia; c) Bavaria; d) Schleswig

2. Region

What are did Prussia add to its territory in 1866?

3. Analyzing Information

Why do you think Austrian influence was greater among the southern German states than among the northern ones?

Thursday HW
1. How did Otto von Bismarck, the Chancellor of Prussia, lead the drive for German unity?

2. What techniques did Bismarck use to unify the German states?

3. How was the new German government, drafted by Bismarck, structured?

4. How did Germany increase its power after unifying in 1871?

5. What events led to German unification?

Friday HW



A Political Game of Chess

This political cartoon shows Otto von Bismarck and Pope Pius IX trying to checkmate each other in a game of chess.

1. How does this cartoon reflect the relationship between Bismarck and the Catholic Church?

2. How did the conflict between church and state affect German politics in the 1870s?

3. Why did industrialization and reform come more slowly to Russia than to Western Europe?

4. How was Great Britain able to avoid a revolution in 1848?

5. How did the election of Andrew Jackson influence American politics?

6. How did the British North American Act change the government of Canada?

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Honors World History II, Fall 2011, Test Chapter 10

TestCh10

2nd Period

Number of Grades 31
Range of Grades (81% - 98%)
Mean 91.2%
Median 93%
Mode 95%

Grade Distribution by Grouping

%
0 - 9
10 - 19
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79
80 - 89 11 Assessment(s) (11)
90 - 99 20 Assessment(s) (20)

Grade Distribution of each Grade

%
81 2 Assessment(s) (2)
82
83
84 1 Assessment(s) (1)
85
86 3 Assessment(s) (3)
87
88 5 Assessment(s) (5)
89
90
91 3 Assessment(s) (3)
92
93 5 Assessment(s) (5)
94
95 10 Assessment(s) (10)
96
97
98 2 Assessment(s) (2)

TestCh10

5th Period

Number of Grades 33
Range of Grades (79% - 95%)
Mean 90.5%
Median 91%
Mode 93%

Grade Distribution by Grouping

%
0 - 9
10 - 19
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79 3 Assessment(s) (3)
80 - 89 6 Assessment(s) (6)
90 - 99 24 Assessment(s) (24)

Grade Distribution of each Grade

%
79 3 Assessment(s) (3)
80
81
82
83
84 1 Assessment(s) (1)
85
86 3 Assessment(s) (3)
87
88 2 Assessment(s) (2)
89
90
91 8 Assessment(s) (8)
92
93 9 Assessment(s) (9)
94
95 7 Assessment(s) (7)

TestCh10

8th Period

Number of Grades 31
Range of Grades (72% - 98%)
Mean 88%
Median 88%
Mode 84%

Grade Distribution by Grouping

%
0 - 9
10 - 19
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79 2 Assessment(s) (2)
80 - 89 15 Assessment(s) (15)
90 - 99 14 Assessment(s) (14)

Grade Distribution of each Grade

%
72 1 Assessment(s) (1)
73
74
75
76
77
78
79 1 Assessment(s) (1)
80
81 3 Assessment(s) (3)
82
83
84 6 Assessment(s) (6)
85
86 4 Assessment(s) (4)
87
88 2 Assessment(s) (2)
89
90
91 3 Assessment(s) (3)
92
93 5 Assessment(s) (5)
94
95 5 Assessment(s) (5)
96
97
98 1 Assessment(s) (1)

Honors Business Economics, Fall 2011, Test Chapter 1

TestChapter1

Number of Grades 23
Range of Grades (77% - 98%)
Mean 86.5%
Median 86%
Mode 84%

Grade Distribution by Grouping

%
0 - 9
10 - 19
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79 2 Assessment(s) (2)
80 - 89 15 Assessment(s) (15)
90 - 99 6 Assessment(s) (6)

Grade Distribution of each Grade

%
77 1 Assessment(s) (1)
78
79 1 Assessment(s) (1)
80
81 2 Assessment(s) (2)
82
83
84 7 Assessment(s) (7)
85
86 4 Assessment(s) (4)
87
88 2 Assessment(s) (2)
89
90
91 2 Assessment(s) (2)
92
93 1 Assessment(s) (1)
94
95 2 Assessment(s) (2)
96
97
98 1 Assessment(s) (1)

Honors Business Economics, Fall 2011, Test Chapter 2

TestChapter2

Number of Grades 22
Range of Grades (63% - 97%)
Mean 88.1%
Median 89%
Mode 86%

Grade Distribution by Grouping

%
0 - 9
10 - 19
20 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 - 59
60 - 69 1 Assessment(s) (1)
70 - 79
80 - 89 12 Assessment(s) (12)
90 - 99 9 Assessment(s) (9)

Grade Distribution of each Grade

%
63 1 Assessment(s) (1)
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80 1 Assessment(s) (1)
81
82
83 1 Assessment(s) (1)
84
85
86 6 Assessment(s) (6)
87
88
89 4 Assessment(s) (4)
90
91 4 Assessment(s) (4)
92
93
94 3 Assessment(s) (3)
95
96
97 2 Assessment(s) (2)